It is no secret that animal testing is a controversial subject.  There are both pros and cons.  Experiments involving animal testing, has led to countless discoveries in medicine.  However, this blog will focus on the modern technologies we will most likely see in the near future, as well as shed some light on the perspective from the other side of the scalpel…

In April of 2015, an article posted on the CNN Fox news website questions this controversy in “Animal Testing – the Pros and Cons”.  Here they mention two advantages, and five disadvantages to testing on animals, then ask the readers to make a judgement call.  Still, a summarized article does not suffice the level of complexity in this issue.

For the full article,


 The advantages stated in paragraph two read, “When used for drug testing, and to a lesser extend for cosmetic testing, and to a lesser extent for cosmetics testing, should make it safer for humans to use these products without unacceptable risks of significant side effects occurring.”

There is no doubt that in the past, testing pharmaceutics on animals has confirmed thousands of drugs, leading to thousands of new milestones in medicine.  But now the unfortunate truth is that these experiments are more often than not done for cosmetic companies, not towards therapeutics or cures.  When the public envisions an animal’s suffering contributing to human lives, it seems justifiable.  Alas, this is most likely not the case.  In fact, according to CBS news, the number of animals used is increased drastically within the last 15 years (2).

It is important to be aware of  recent technological advancements.  For example, products can be directly tested on in-vitro human  cells and tissues now which is more accurate and time consuming (See chapter 2: Cosmetic Testing).  It is also important to be skeptic about all journalism; for sometimes we’re not seeing the whole picture.

CNN Fox News also points out five disadvantages of testing on animals.  All five pertain to cosmetics being a luxury rather than life threatening therefore it is even more inhumane, as well as mentioning that there must be other forms of applied science to substitute animal subjects.

This did not exactly address the new technologies available today and the many benefits they also have to offer.  Thankfully, recent proclamation of animals rights has led to a demand in non-animal testing methods.  As mentioned in previous blog entries, there are many including:  in-vitro, stem cell research, computer methods and more.  The notable benefits of these techniques being: time consuming, cost effective, faster, cleaner, the ability to test multiple products at once, and not to mention, cruelty free.

Despite the fact that this article was a mere summary of the contentious situation, it still lacked adequate information in order for the reader to make a valid stance on the matter.   

“The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy”

–Martin Luther King Jr.



3 thoughts on “Chapter 3: A New Perspective

  1. Hello Sam,

    Wow! I thought the 5 disadvantages that you mentioned were very shocking to me because as you said, all five of them revolved around a luxury rather than something that is harmful and life-threatening. I really enjoyed your pictures in your blog, and i especially loved the last one! I feel like this topic is one with many sides and arguments but many people never really stop to think about the harmful things that are going on in the world. I feel like we need to appreciate what we have and protect humans and animals.


  2. That is pretty shocking to me! When I think of using animals for “science”, I usually think about testing life-saving drugs or understanding the nature of cancer, but I did not expect this! I think it’s pretty terrible to kill animals in order for us to get a new beauty product.
    Very nice article, looking foreword to read the next!


  3. First let me start by saying that you ended your chapter with best quote ever. I love it. Second, I think we have more alternative methods to animal testing, yet, company do not follow them. I do not know why. However, I think more methods are more expensive than animal testing therefore it is easy to be avoided by companies. Even though if they are looking for the less costing testings, it does not justify using animal instead.Overall, Awesome blog!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s